The interesting thing about this "Song Phrase 2 Hypothesis"
is that Song Phrase 2 is continuous in COFL and broken in PSFL, just the OPPOSITE of the standard MPN of
these forms. For either species, alternating its MPN and SP2 at a time of day when MPN is usually the only sound
could easily give the impression of bilinguality! Bear in mind that both species also may insert the MPN into the
rapidly repeated Advertising Song at dawn. Construing a Male Position Note as a Song Phrase 2 at this time could also
give the impression of bilinguality.
The bottom line, in my opinion, is that before you accuse a bird of being bilingual, you must be able to discriminate
four different sounds, both MPN and Song Phrase 2 of both species. That doesn't mean bilingual birds aren't out
there. Send me a recording of a bilingual bird and I'll
put it on this site.
Introduction
Characteristics of Sounds
List of Geographic Samples
Numerous birders have told me of "bilingual" birds.
Although most folks don't use Ned Johnson's
terminology, which I recommend,
I think most such reports refer to the MPN, which is indeed problematic. So far I have thought of
four possible explanations for such reports. Which is correct, in each case, would be
readily apparent if recordings were available of these "bilingual" birds. So, get out your
recording devices and bring back the goods! Meanwhile, here are the possibilities that have occurred to
me: